182 / 194
182
(200) Abu>>
Dawu>d 4/333 and declared Hasan by Al-
Alba>ni> in S{ah}i>h}
Abu>
Dawu>d, 3/965.
(201) Al-Bukha>ri>
with Al-Fath} 4/88.
(202) An-Nasa’i>
in [‘Amal al-Yawm wa Al-
Laylah], page 300 and Ibn Ma>jah 2/809, see:
S{ah}i>h} Ibn Ma>jah 2/55.
(203) Ah}
mad 4/403 and others and see: S{ah}i>h}
Al-
Ja>mi‘ 3/233 and Al-Alba>ni>’s S{ah}i>h} At-
Targhi>b wa At-Tarhi>b 1/19.
(204) Ibn As-Sunni>, pg. 138, 278 and see: [Al-
Wa>bil As-S{ayyib] by Ibn Al-Qayyim, pg.
304, checking of Basha>r Muh}ammad ‘UyNn.
(205) Ah}
mad 2/220 and Ibn As-Sunni> 292 and
declared D{a‘i>f by Al-Alba>ni> in [Al-Ah{
a>di>th
as}
-S{ah}i>h}ah], 3/54, 1065.
(206) Abu>>
Dawu>d 3/34 and At-Tirmiz}
i> 5/501 and
see: S{ah}i>h}
At-Tirmiz}
i> 3/156.
(207) Muslim 2/998.
(208) Al-H{a>kim and he declared it authentic and
Az}
-Z{ahabi> agreed 2/100, and Ibn As-Sunni>
524. Al-Alba>ni> declared it Hasan as in the
checking of Al-Az}ka>
r 5/154. Ibn Ba>z said:
“It is related by An-Nasa’i>
with a Hasan
chain.” See Tuh}fah Al-Akhya>r, pg. 37