167
(63) An-Nasa’i>
’s wording 3/52, Ah}
mad 4/338
and Al-Alba>ni> declared it D{a‘i>f in S{ah}i>h}
An-Nasa’i>
, 1/280.
(64) Abu>>
Dawu>d, At-Tirmiz}
i>, Ibn Ma>jah & An-
Nasa’i>
, see: S{ah}i>h} Ibn Ma>jah 2/329.
(65) Abu>>
Dawu>d 2/62 and At-Tirmiz}
i> 5/515, Ibn
Ma>jah 2/1267 and Ah}
mad 5/360, see: S{ah}i>h}
Ibn Ma>jah 2/329 and S{ah}i>h}
At-Tirmiz}
i>
3/163.
(66) Muslim 1/414.
(67) Al-Bukha>ri> 1/255 and Muslim 1/414.
(68) Muslim 1/415.
(69) Muslim 1/418.
(70) Abu>>
Dawu>d 2/86 and An-Nasa’i>
3/68, see:
S{ah}i>h}
At-Tirmiz}
i> 2/8.
(71) An-Nasa’i>
in [‘Amal Al-Yawm wa Al-
Laylah], 100 and Ibn As-Sunni>, 121.
Declared D{a‘i>f by Al-Alba>ni> in S{ah}i>h} Al-
Ja>mi‘ 5/339 and Silsilah Al-Ah}
a>di>th As-
S{ah}i>h}ah, 2/697, 972.
(72) At-Tirmiz}
i> 5/515 and Ah}
mad 4/227. Refer
to it’s validation in ‘Awn Al-Ma‘bu>d
1/300.