169 / 194
169
(81) Abu>>
Dawu>d 4/318 and An-Nasa’i>
in [‘Amal
Al-Yawm Wa Al-Laylah], 7, Ibn As-Sunni>
41
and
Ibn
H{ibba>n
[Mawa>
rid],
2361.Shaykh Ibn Ba>z declared it Hasan,
see: [Tuh}fah Al-Akhya>r], Pg. 24.
(82) Abu>>
Dawu>d 4/324, Ah}
mad 5/42, An-Nasa’i>
in [‘Amal Al-Yawm Wa Al-Laylah], 22,
Ibn As-Sunni> 69, Al-Bukha>ri> related it in
[Adab Al-Mufrad]. Shaykh Ibn Ba>z
declared it Hasan, see: [Tuh}fah Al-
Akhya>r], Pg. 26.
(83) Ibn As-Sunni> 71, Abu>>
Dawu>d related it as a
statement of a Companion, 4/321. Shu‘ayb
and ‘Abdul-Qa>
dir Al-Arna’u>t declared it to
be D{a‘i>f, see ‘Awn Al-Ma‘bu>d 2/376.
(84) Abu>>
Dawu>d and Ibn Ma>jah, see: S{ah}i>h} Ibn
Ma>jah 2/332.
(85) At-Tirmiz}
i> and Abu>
Dawu>d, see: S{ah}i>h}
At-
Tirmiz}
i> 3/142.
(86) Abu>>
Dawu>d 4/323, At-Tirmiz}
i>
5/465, Ibn
Ma>jah and Ah}
mad. see: S{ah}i>h} Ibn Ma>jah
2/332. Ibn Ba>z declared its chain Hasan in
[Tuh}fah Al-Akhya>r], pg. 39.